Use of alternative and local ingredients in poultry diet

24.03.23
Share this post
Share on LinkedInShare on XShare on Facebook
✅ Link copied to clipboard!

By Bing Guo, El Mehdi El Ouahli, John Dunne, Pierre-André Geraert

We are presently going through a challenging period of high prices of raw materials and a limited availability of some of these materials. The use of less common raw materials that are readily available, and potentially less expensive, can be an alternative to traditional protein and energy sources and may help reduce the pressure on feed costs. However, new types of ingredients need extra attention to be paid to make sure they are suitable for feed processing, are free of contaminants, and can deliver the right amount of nutrients to the animals for an optimal performance and health.

The quest for alternative ingredients

According to recent Rabobank figures (2022), soybean still dominates the world markets, with the US, Brazil and Argentina being the three largest producers. Soybean meal is one of the main ingredients in animal diets around the world because of its nutritional value, its stability in quality and availability, and has hence been called ‘the gold standard’ in animal feeds. However, with the double digit spikes in market prices observed over the last year, soy is – metaphorically – not far behind from being equally valued as real gold.

Because of the soaring prices (together with with environmental concerns about soybean production amongst others), animal nutritionists and farmers are looking for new ways to reduce feed costs. This is not an easy task, as there is a limited availability of alternative protein sources, such as rapeseed meal, sunflower meal, peanut meal and cottonseed meal.

poultry-05-b.jpg

Extra attention is needed for optimal use

In spite of their limited availability, the use of alternative ingredients has become a must in most regions in the world. When replacing soybean meal (completely or partly) with alternative ingredients (often from new and different suppliers), it is crucial to determine their nutritional value and their overall quality. Using alternative and less common feed ingredients can be particularly beneficial from a cost and nutritional perspective, but it may require paying extra attention to find the best way to use them in animal diets. Alternative ingredients may have a fickle and inconsistent fiber and protein level (see Table 1), can contain elevated mycotoxin levels and may react differently in (already existing) feed processing equipment. It should be kept in mind that there are no bad feed ingredients, and they should simply be used in the right way.

Table 1 – Some of the characteristics of a selection of alternative ingredients (compared with soybean meal).

Canola/rapeseed
meal
  • Higher fiber content and more variations
  • AntiNutritional Factors (ANFs)
  • Lower lysine digestibility
Cottonseed
meal
  • Higher variations in CP %, due to the processing methods
  • ANFs (gossypol)
  • Lower lysine digestibility
Sunflower
meal
  • Variations in the fiber %, due to the processing methods
  • ANFs
  • Lower in lysine
Copra (coconut)
meal
  • Large variations in the energy level (oil residual)
  • Low lysine digestibility, due to the drying process
  • Mannan and galactomanna
Palm kernel
meal
  • High in fiber (~20%), with medium levels of CP (~15%)
  • Deficiency in lysine and methionine
  • Large variations in the energy level (oil residual)
  • Manan and galactomannan
DDGS
  • Rich in protein, and low in lysine
  • Lower digestibility of the amino acids
  • Variability in quality, due to the process
  • Risk of mycotoxin contamination
  • Negative impact on fat quality

Adapting the practices in the feed mill

Using alternative or new feed ingredients can have an effect at different levels (and on the costs) in feed production plants. Before making the decision to start using something new, it is necessary to know that the ingredient is safe to use, compatible with the existing plant equipment and should not increase the feed processing costs. This can be a challenge, as new ingredients may come in smaller quantities (smaller bags for instance), may be sourced from different regions, and may not be suitable for storage in silos. This can lead to the requirement of more manpower and a greater storage space.

The density of the material, its resistance to pests and molds, and the levels of shrinkage can also deviate from those of commonly used ingredients. Moreover, the feedstuff properties (such as hardness, moisture content, fiber content and particle size) can have an effect on the throughput (kg/hour) and energy consumption of the feed processing equipment. For example, some alternative ingredients may require a longer mixing time, thus leading to an increase in energy costs. Using alternative ingredients can also increase the quality control costs, as more feed analyses are on average conducted on unknown raw materials.

Preventing nutrient losses due to contaminants

The performance and health of animals can also be compromised when ingredients are contaminated. The presence of molds, bacteria and oxidized lipids are examples that can lead to severe nutrient losses, reduced palatability and reduced feed intake levels. When there are mycotoxin producing molds present in the feeds, the effects on animals’ performance and economic losses can be even more serious. Mycotoxins are a particular challenge for alternative feed ingredients, and even a low inclusion rate in the diet can contribute to the final risk. Such commonly used alternative ingredients as DDGS, wheat bran and wheat millings, all have a relatively high risk of containing mycotoxins. However, all types of raw materials are prone to molds and mycotoxin formation, which depend on the weather conditions, crop production, harvest, transport, storage conditions and feed processing. There is also a lack of rapid test kits to test mycotoxins in alternative materials, and it takes longer to monitor a diverse range of variable quality materials. It is recommended to test the finished feeds more often when different (new) ingredients are used and to not use too many new ingredients at once, thus avoiding multiple challenges at the same time.

Solutions to maintain diet quality and animal performance

Several effective approaches are available to help make the right decision when using alternative feed ingredients in times of volatile and uncertain market conditions.

  1. Rapid feed testing methods: Using NIR is a fast and accurate way of determining the nutritional values, which is key for the optimum quality control of alternative feed ingredients that are prone to variable nutrient contents. The finished feeds should be regularly tested for mycotoxins. Learn more about PNE service.
  2. Enzymes: The use of enzymes can increase the digestibility of alternative feed ingredients that are prone to a high fiber content and can help to buffer the variability of ingredients. Learn more about Rovabio® Advance.
  3. Mycotoxins inactivators: The use of these in-feed products help the animals overcome mycotoxin challenge in high risk feed ingredients (such as DDGS). Lear more about our mycotoxin deactivator range: Unike Plus, Toxy-Nil Plus and Toxy-Nil.
  4. Antioxidants: The supplementation of animal diets with antioxidants such as Oxy-Nil, can help prevent fat and protein oxidation of alternative feed ingredients that are sensitive to this type of degradation.

Adisseo offers a variety of solutions that are key to making alternative feed ingredients work in animal diets. These solutions include NIR services (Adisseo’s Precise Nutrition Evaluation platform), digestibility boosters and products to manage feed preservation and mycotoxins. The positive effect of Adisseo’s multi-NSPase (Rovabio®) on dry matter degradability has been shown in an in vitro trial. Table 2 shows the results of adding enzymes on the dry matter degradability and variance.

Table 2 – The dry matter degradability of a range of feed ingredients, with and without enzymes.

 Number of samplesDM degradability
without enzymes (%)
DM degradability
with Rovabio® (%)
Difference (%)
Wheat1358.0 ± 7.186.2 ± 2.328.2
Wheat DDGS2341.3 ± 6.050.9 ± 5.59.6
Corn DDGS1620.5 ± 12.126.7 ± 13.46.2
Cassava950.5 ± 18.770.3 ± 14.619.8

In summary, the use of alternative feed ingredients is currently increasing due to the high prices of such commonly used ingredients as soybean meal. However, the availability of alternative feed ingredients, such as rapeseed meal and DDGS, is still way below the previously produced volumes of soybean meal and can differ in quality.

Therefore, the quality and nutritional value of alternative feed ingredients should be carefully monitored. Variations in the protein and fiber contents, higher risks of mycotoxins and the presence of some bitter components may lead to lower feed intake levels, and to losses in nutrients. A cheap ingredient may therefore end up being an extra cost, because of the loss of animal performance. The use of feed additives (such as Rovabio®), regular testing of the nutritional values with quick methods (NIRS as PNE) and regular testing of the finished feeds for contaminants all help to control the problems that arise when using feed ingredients that are new to the nutritionist, farmer and animals.

We look forward to discussing our products and solutions with you individually to help you make better informed decisions when you are thinking of using alternative feed ingredients in your feed formulations.

 

Product names and availability may vary by region, please contact your local Adisseo representative for more information.

Enter your email to read the full article

Please enter your email to access all content and download with one login.

decoration

Associated solutions

Product names and availability may vary by region, please contact your local Adisseo representative for more information.

 

Our Feed Enzymes: Rovabio®

Cereals used as feed ingredients contain indigestible fractions fibers which lower feed digestibility. Breaking down these components requires specific enzymes to be added into the feed. This is crucial to avoid the loss of valuable nutrients and its economic and environmental impact.

Rovabio® is a range of enzyme solutions that improves the digestibility of feedstuffs from vegetal origin for animals, poultry and swine. Rovabio® delivers cost savings and animal performance while contributing to a better breeding environment, for more sustainability.

You want to know more about one of our enzyme solutions, click on the below related buttons.

Unike
Unike is a powerful protection against broad-spectrum mycotoxin contamination.
See more
SwinePoultry
Separator
Unike Plus
Maximum protection against broad-spectrum mycotoxin contamination and their consequences on the animals.
See more
PoultrySwineRuminants
Separator
Toxy-Nil
Toxy-nil is a reliable protection against moderate-level mycotoxin contamination.
See more
PoultryRuminants
Separator
Rovabio® Advance
Unique enzymatic profile, multi-carbohydrase with debranching enzymes tested under all the main conditions.
See more
PoultrySwineAquaculture
Separator
Rovabio® Advance PHY
The second-generation feedase with a unique enzyme combination designed to extract more value from the feed.
See more
PoultrySwineAquaculture
Separator

Related articles

Top line
Optimize overall digestibility of the feed to capture its nutritive full value
Optimize overall digestibility of the feed to capture its nutritive full value
Tag Separator
Technical article
Top line
Optimize feed cost by considering the full matrix value of Rhodimet® AT88 in poultry feed formulation !
Optimize feed cost by considering the full matrix value of Rhodimet® AT88 in poultry feed formulation !
Tag Separator
Technical article
Top line
Deal with raw material variability
Deal with raw material variability
Tag Separator
Technical article
Top line
Saving energy when pelleting
Saving energy when pelleting
Tag Separator
Technical article

I want to be contacted

* required fields
Please select

The information collected in this form is transmitted to the appropriate Adisseo department to manage your comments and requests for information on the site. For more information, please refer to the information notice.

Contact us
Adisseo
© 2025 Adisseo.

You are in Europe region